HIST1006: Prof. Owen's Module

Document studies
Essay questions
Bibliography
Members of Staff
HIST1006 Lectures
HIST1006 Syllabus
Search the HIST1006 website
Department of History homepage
University of Hong Kong homepage
HKU Library homepage

 

INITIAL BRITISH PLANS FOR AUSTRALIA, 1786

 

In the late 18th century the government of Great Britain became increasingly concerned about the size of its prison population, which was growing rapidly. This was due in part to the effects of “enclosure,” which drove many peasants off the land that they had traditionally farmed and into the cities, where they could not find adequate employment. There was also a very harsh criminal code, which tended to favour the interests of property-owners over the poor. Even the expedient of jailing some convicts in “hulks” – abandoned ships moored in the harbour – was not enough to keep up with the demand for prisons.

Sending convicts to penal colonies overseas, or “Transportation,” had been inaugurated earlier in the century, but troubles with the North American colonies (which led to the independence of the United States) made this solution less practicable. At about the same time (the 1770s), however, the Pacific explorations of Captain James Cook led to Britain claiming the little-known island continent of Australia, and opened the possibility of establishing a new penal colony there. In 1786 the government formalized a plan for a colony at Botany Bay, just south of the present city of Sydney

 

Read the document below and answer the following questions:

1.      What was the principal reason for the British settlement planned for Botany Bay? What other potential uses for the settlement did the planners see? 

2.      What advantages was Botany Bay believed to have over alternative sites? 

3.      How were the settlers expected to feed themselves, in the short run and the long run? 

4.      What was the attitude – stated or implied – of the British government toward the native populations of Australia and the South Sea islands? 

Does the whole project seem to you a sensible one? If not, what might have been done differently?

 

Lord Sydney to the Lords Commissioner of the Treasury, 18 August 1786:     

The several gaols and places for the confinement of felons in this kingdom being in so crowded a state that the greatest danger is to be apprehended, not only from their escape, but from infectious distempers [contagious diseases], which may hourly be expected to break out amongst them, his Majesty, desirous of preventing by every possible means the ill consequences which might happen from either of these causes, has [commanded] that measures should immediately be pursued for sending out of this kingdom such of the convicts as are under sentence or order of transportation. 

The Nautilus sloop, which … had been sent to explore the southern coast of Africa, in order to find out an eligible situation for the reception of the said convicts, … having lately returned, and it appearing by the report of her officers that the several parts of the coast which they examined … are sandy and barren, and from other causes unfit for a settlement of that description, his Majesty has thought it advisable to fix upon Botany Bay, situated on the coast of New South Wales, … which, according to the accounts given by the late Captain Cook, … is looked upon as a place likely to answer the above purposes. 

I am, therefore, commanded to signify to your Lordships his Majesty's pleasure that you do forthwith take such measures as may be necessary for providing a proper number of vessels for the conveyance of 750 convicts to Botany Bay, together with such provisions, necessaries, and implements for agriculture as may be necessary for their use after their arrival…. 

According to the best opinions that can be obtained, it is supposed that a quantity of provisions equal to two years' consumption should be provided…

 

            HEADS [main points] OF A PLAN 

Heads of a plan for effectually disposing of convicts, and rendering their transportation reciprocally beneficial both to themselves and to the State, by the establishment of a colony in New South Wales, a country which, by the fertility and salubrity [healthiness] of the climate, connected with the remoteness of its situation (from whence it is hardly possible for persons to return without permission), seems peculiarly adapted to answer the views of Government with respect to the providing a remedy for the evils likely to result from the late alarming and numerous increase of felons in this country, and more particularly in the metropolis [London]. 

It is proposed that a ship of war of a proper class … should be got ready as soon as possible to serve as an escort to the convict ships …. 

That, in addition to their crews, they should take on board two companies of marines to form a military establishment on shore (not only for the protection of the settlement, if requisite, against the natives, but for the preservation of good order), together with an assortment of stores, utensils, and implements, necessary for erecting habitations and for agriculture, and such quantities of provisions as may be proper for the use of the crews. 

As many of the marines as possible should be artificers [craftsmen], such as carpenters, sawyers, smiths, potters (if possible), and some husbandmen [farmers]. … 

That these vessels should touch at the Cape of Good Hope, or any other places that may be convenient, for any seed that may be requisite to be taken from thence, and for such livestock as they can possibly contain … for the use of the settlement at large. 

That Government should immediately provide a certain number of ships to receive on board at least seven or eight hundred convicts, and that one of them should be properly fitted for the accommodation of the women, to prevent their intercourse [contact, communication] with the men. 

That these ships should take on board as much provisions as they can possibly stow, or at least a sufficient quantity for two years' consumption; supposing one year to be issued at whole allowance, and the other year's provisions at half allowance, which will last two years longer, by which time, it is presumed, the colony, with the livestock and grain which may be raised by a common industry on the part of the new settlers, will be fully sufficient for their maintenance and support. 

….. 

That each of the ships should have on board at least two surgeons' mates, to attend to the wants of the sick, and should be supplied with a proper assortment of medicines and instruments, and that two of them should remain with the settlement. 

After the arrival of the ships which are intended to convey the convicts, the ship of war and tender [attendant vessel] may be employed in obtaining livestock from the Cape, or from the Molucca Islands [Maluku, in present-day Indonesia], …; or the tender, if it should be thought most advisable, may be employed in conveying to the new settlement a further number of women from the Friendly Islands [Tonga], New Caledonia, Etc., which are contiguous thereto, and from whence any number may be procured without difficulty; and without a sufficient proportion of that sex it is well-known that it would be impossible to preserve the settlement from gross irregularities and disorders. 

The whole regulation and management of the settlement should be committed to the care of a discreet officer, …. 

.…. 

… In favour of this plan [is the fact] that considerable advantage will arise from the cultivation of the New Zealand hemp or flax-plant in the new intended settlement … 

Most of the Asiatic productions may also without doubt be cultivated in the new settlement, and in a few years may render our recourse to our European neighbours for those productions unnecessary. 

[There is also] the possibility of procuring from New Zealand any quantity of masts and ship timber for the use of our fleets in India, as the distance between the two countries is not greater than between Great Britain and America. It grows close to the water's edge, of size and quality superior to any hitherto known, and may be obtained without difficulty.

 

From C.M.H. [Manning] Clark, Select Documents in Australian History: 1788-1850 (London: Angus & Robertson, 1950), pp. 33-37.

 Introduction and questions Ó Norman G. Owen

Top of page